[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#40697: 25.3; sort-lines not accepting reverse parameter
|
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
|
Subject: |
bug#40697: 25.3; sort-lines not accepting reverse parameter |
|
Date: |
Sat, 18 Apr 2020 19:27:53 +0300 |
> From: Štěpán Němec
> <stepnem@gmail.com>
> Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2020 18:15:37 +0200
> Cc: 40697@debbugs.gnu.org
>
> Maybe we should improve the wording? Would just saying "When called
> interactively, prefix argument means sort in descending order" be
> enough?
Yes, and BEG/END being the region was also not described. I fixed
that now.
- bug#40697: 25.3; sort-lines not accepting reverse parameter, Roland Hughes, 2020/04/18
- bug#40697: 25.3; sort-lines not accepting reverse parameter, Štěpán Němec, 2020/04/18
- bug#40697: 25.3; sort-lines not accepting reverse parameter,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- bug#40697: 25.3; sort-lines not accepting reverse parameter, Roland Hughes, 2020/04/18
- bug#40697: 25.3; sort-lines not accepting reverse parameter, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/04/18
- bug#40697: 25.3; sort-lines not accepting reverse parameter, Roland Hughes, 2020/04/18
- bug#40697: 25.3; sort-lines not accepting reverse parameter, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/04/19
- bug#40697: 25.3; sort-lines not accepting reverse parameter, Roland Hughes, 2020/04/19
- bug#40697: 25.3; sort-lines not accepting reverse parameter, Noam Postavsky, 2020/04/19
- bug#40697: 25.3; sort-lines not accepting reverse parameter, Roland Hughes, 2020/04/19