[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#38181: Actual height of mode-line not taken into account
From: |
martin rudalics |
Subject: |
bug#38181: Actual height of mode-line not taken into account |
Date: |
Mon, 4 May 2020 17:04:18 +0200 |
> I don't think I follow. Are you saying that
> inhibit-free-realized-faces is non-nil when you run Lisp
> interactively,
Yes.
> or in general in a Lisp program that was not called,
> directly or indirectly, from redisplay_internal? That should never
> happen, as the code arranges for inhibit-free-realized-faces to be
> reset to its original value when redisplay_internal returns. If this
> doesn't work, then we have a serious bug on our hands, and should fix
> it ASAP.
The problem here seems that the original value is true. So if I'm not
entirely misguided it must be somehow set by PRODUCE_GLYPHS outside of
redisplay_internal.
> This variable is supposed to be non-nil only when we are done
> preparing the desired matrices and are about to call update_frame,
> because that function cannot cope with faces referenced in the desired
> matrices that were meanwhile freed. This could happen if some hook
> called from redisplay_internal manages to run code that decides to
> free the faces.
>
> But once update_frame is done, we don't need this variable set
> anymore, and it should revert to nil soon enough, because
> redisplay_internal returns soon after that.
>
> What am I missing?
Your explanation coincides with how I expected this variable to behave.
It does not coincide with the behavior I see.
Thanks, martin
- bug#38181: Actual height of mode-line not taken into account, martin rudalics, 2020/05/02
- bug#38181: Actual height of mode-line not taken into account, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/05/04
- bug#38181: Actual height of mode-line not taken into account,
martin rudalics <=
- bug#38181: Actual height of mode-line not taken into account, martin rudalics, 2020/05/04
- bug#38181: Actual height of mode-line not taken into account, martin rudalics, 2020/05/05
- bug#38181: Actual height of mode-line not taken into account, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/05/05
- bug#38181: Actual height of mode-line not taken into account, martin rudalics, 2020/05/05
- bug#38181: Actual height of mode-line not taken into account, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/05/05
- bug#38181: Actual height of mode-line not taken into account, martin rudalics, 2020/05/06
- bug#38181: Actual height of mode-line not taken into account, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/05/06
- bug#38181: Actual height of mode-line not taken into account, martin rudalics, 2020/05/06
- bug#38181: Actual height of mode-line not taken into account, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/05/06
- bug#38181: Actual height of mode-line not taken into account, martin rudalics, 2020/05/07