[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#40968: 28.0.50; (apply nil)
From: |
Stefan Kangas |
Subject: |
bug#40968: 28.0.50; (apply nil) |
Date: |
Wed, 6 May 2020 07:24:13 -0400 |
Pip Cet <pipcet@gmail.com> writes:
> Thanks. I disagree that it would be harder to understand, though: "the
> first argument is a function to call, the last argument is a list of
> arguments" is easy to understand when there are >= 2 arguments, but
> for a single argument they're in contradiction, aren't they? Indeed,
> I'd read Fapply's current docstring:
I have a feeling I'm missing something obvious here. The current
function signature is:
(apply FUNCTION &rest ARGUMENTS)
How would your proposal change that?
Best regards,
Stefan Kangas
- bug#40968: 28.0.50; (apply nil), Stefan Kangas, 2020/05/05
- bug#40968: 28.0.50; (apply nil), Pip Cet, 2020/05/06
- bug#40968: 28.0.50; (apply nil),
Stefan Kangas <=
- bug#40968: 28.0.50; (apply nil), Pip Cet, 2020/05/06
- bug#40968: 28.0.50; (apply nil), Stefan Kangas, 2020/05/06
- bug#40968: 28.0.50; (apply nil), Pip Cet, 2020/05/06
- bug#40968: 28.0.50; (apply nil), Stefan Kangas, 2020/05/06
- bug#40968: 28.0.50; (apply nil), Pip Cet, 2020/05/06
- bug#40968: 28.0.50; (apply nil), Drew Adams, 2020/05/06
- bug#40968: 28.0.50; (apply nil), Eli Zaretskii, 2020/05/06
- bug#40968: 28.0.50; (apply nil), Pip Cet, 2020/05/06
- bug#40968: 28.0.50; (apply nil), Eli Zaretskii, 2020/05/06
- bug#40968: 28.0.50; (apply nil), Drew Adams, 2020/05/06