[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#26909: 25.1; A face for margins
From: |
Clément Pit-Claudel |
Subject: |
bug#26909: 25.1; A face for margins |
Date: |
Tue, 12 May 2020 13:28:27 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0 |
On 12/05/2020 13.21, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> Cc: yuri.v.khan@gmail.com, 26909@debbugs.gnu.org
>> From: Clément Pit-Claudel <cpitclaudel@gmail.com>
>> Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 13:06:00 -0400
>>
>>> Something like that, yes. But you will need to make sure
>>> extend_face_to_end_of_line is called also for empty lines. And of
>>> course the "silly" changes need to be made less silly.
>>
>> Where the less silly strategy would be to only run the extend_face code when
>> the margins face isn't customized, right?
>
> The other way around, surely?
Indeed.
>>> And you need
>>> to compute the pixel-width of the stretch glyph, since the code you
>>> cited only places a single SPC character there, which is not what you
>>> want if the margin is wider than one column.
>>
>> Hmm, I think the code already does that?
>
> Does it where? space_glyph is initiated in init_display_interactive,
> and I don't see its pixel_width changed anywhere. What do you get in
> the width of that glyph in the margins?
>
>>>> + case MARGIN_FACE_ID: name = Qmargin; break;
>>>
>>> If this is going to be an additional basic face, then why do you call
>>> lookup_named_face and not lookup_basic_face?
>>
>> It's because I have no idea what a basic face is, so I just cribbed from
>> places that use the fringe face. It does things like the following, and I
>> have no idea what those mean:
>>
>> face_id = NILP (face) ? lookup_named_face (w, f, Qfringe, false)
>> : lookup_derived_face (w, f, face, FRINGE_FACE_ID, 0);
>> if (face_id < 0)
>> face_id = FRINGE_FACE_ID;
>
> Why not "crib" from a few lines above the code you hacked, where it
> gets at the default face?
Or from below, where it says "face_id = FRINGE_FACE_ID;"… I don't know: I don't
know what this code does. I will try to take the time to understand it; the
original silly patch was just a few lines thrown together as a proof of concept.