[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#41810: 28.0.50; [ELPA] adaptive-wrap: Fontify wrap-prefix
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
bug#41810: 28.0.50; [ELPA] adaptive-wrap: Fontify wrap-prefix |
Date: |
Thu, 11 Jun 2020 18:42:26 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
> The comment's continuation line starts with ";;;;". I see two problems
> with this:
>
> 1. The padding characters are not propertized, so we get two fontified
> semicolons, then two unfontified semicolons.
That looks ugly, indeed. IIRC the reason is that when we extract the
prefix from the buffer, font-lock hasn't applied its `face` text
property yet.
> 2. Visually, this looks sort of cluttered. I have searched Debbugs and
> emacs-devel for a rationale for using (substring fcp -1) instead of
> unconditionally using spaces, but I could not find any.
I think it just seemed like a good idea. I suspect it's a matter of taste.
Not sure if it's important enough to justify offering both behaviors.
> See second screenshot, taken from emacs -Q -rv, with:
That's ugly, indeed. Not sure whether the problem really comes from nor
where it should be fixed, but it's clearly a bug.
Stefan
- bug#41810: 28.0.50; [ELPA] adaptive-wrap: Fontify wrap-prefix, Kévin Le Gouguec, 2020/06/11
- bug#41810: 28.0.50; [ELPA] adaptive-wrap: Fontify wrap-prefix,
Stefan Monnier <=
- bug#41810: 28.0.50; [ELPA] adaptive-wrap: Fontify wrap-prefix, Kévin Le Gouguec, 2020/06/12
- bug#41810: 28.0.50; [ELPA] adaptive-wrap: Fontify wrap-prefix, Stefan Monnier, 2020/06/12
- bug#41810: 28.0.50; [ELPA] adaptive-wrap: Fontify wrap-prefix, Kévin Le Gouguec, 2020/06/12
- bug#41810: [PATCH][ELPA] adaptive-wrap: Fontify wrap-prefix, Kévin Le Gouguec, 2020/06/21
- bug#41810: [PATCH][ELPA] adaptive-wrap: Fontify wrap-prefix, Basil L. Contovounesios, 2020/06/21
- bug#41810: [PATCH][ELPA] adaptive-wrap: Fontify wrap-prefix, Kévin Le Gouguec, 2020/06/21