[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#15803: default-file-name-coding-system: utf-8 better than latin-1 th
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#15803: default-file-name-coding-system: utf-8 better than latin-1 these days? |
Date: |
Fri, 11 Sep 2020 18:11:32 +0300 |
> From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>
> Cc: rgm@gnu.org, 15803@debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 16:54:46 +0200
>
> > make check TEST_LOCALE=<whatever>
> >
> > Does it help to use the locale you have set?
>
> That allows the files to be compiled, but some tests fail:
>
> Files examined: 305
> Ran 4241 tests, 4197 results as expected, 5 unexpected, 39 skipped
> 5 files contained unexpected results:
> src/emacs-module-tests.log
> src/callint-tests.log
> lisp/subr-tests.log
> lisp/net/tramp-archive-tests.log
> lisp/emacs-lisp/gv-tests.log
Maybe these tests expect some special locale. For example,
emacs-module-tests could expect UTF-8, since we don't support
non-UTF-8 strings in modules.
Anyway, I think if this is down to a couple of tests, we can install
the changes, as the problems they uncover are elsewhere.
- bug#15803: default-file-name-coding-system: utf-8 better than latin-1 these days?, (continued)
- bug#15803: default-file-name-coding-system: utf-8 better than latin-1 these days?, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2020/09/11
- bug#15803: default-file-name-coding-system: utf-8 better than latin-1 these days?, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/09/11
- bug#15803: default-file-name-coding-system: utf-8 better than latin-1 these days?, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2020/09/11
- bug#15803: default-file-name-coding-system: utf-8 better than latin-1 these days?, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/09/11
- bug#15803: default-file-name-coding-system: utf-8 better than latin-1 these days?, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2020/09/11
- bug#15803: default-file-name-coding-system: utf-8 better than latin-1 these days?, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/09/11
- bug#15803: default-file-name-coding-system: utf-8 better than latin-1 these days?, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2020/09/11
- bug#15803: default-file-name-coding-system: utf-8 better than latin-1 these days?, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2020/09/11
- bug#15803: default-file-name-coding-system: utf-8 better than latin-1 these days?, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/09/11
- bug#15803: default-file-name-coding-system: utf-8 better than latin-1 these days?, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2020/09/11
- bug#15803: default-file-name-coding-system: utf-8 better than latin-1 these days?,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- bug#15803: default-file-name-coding-system: utf-8 better than latin-1 these days?, Michael Albinus, 2020/09/12
- bug#15803: default-file-name-coding-system: utf-8 better than latin-1 these days?, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2020/09/12
- bug#15803: default-file-name-coding-system: utf-8 better than latin-1 these days?, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2020/09/11
- bug#15803: default-file-name-coding-system: utf-8 better than latin-1 these days?, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/09/11
bug#15803: default-file-name-coding-system: utf-8 better than latin-1 these days?, Stefan Kangas, 2020/09/09