bug#1321: process-lines

[Lars Ingebrigtsen]

"Peder O. Klingenberg" <peder@klingenberg.no> writes:

> That’s another possibility, of course.  But in my opinion, the &rest
> is usually a more convenient API for the callers, saving them the
> trouble of consing up a new list.

Yup, makes sense to me.

Stefan raises the excellent objection that `process-lines' is pretty
trivial, and that it's not much used.  The former is definitely true,
but I wonder whether the reason it's not used much is because of the
very awkward interface.  Peder's patch fixes this by introducing a
-ignore-status version of the function (which is how it should have been
all along), so perhaps this version will get more usage.

So I've applied Peder's patch to Emacs 28.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no