[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#5042: bug#9917: bug#5042: bug#9917: 24.0.90; Make `goto-line' consis
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#5042: bug#9917: bug#5042: bug#9917: 24.0.90; Make `goto-line' consistent with the line number from the minibuffer |
Date: |
Wed, 23 Sep 2020 17:14:29 +0300 |
> Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 13:10:09 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Drew Adams <drew.adams@oracle.com>
> Cc: dmoncayo@gmail.com, 9917@debbugs.gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca,
> 5042@debbugs.gnu.org
>
> > 3.2. 'goto-line-relative' is bound in Info mode to `M-g M-g'.
>
> I gave my opinion about this. And it was a reason given
> for having two different commands: Do not base which
> command gets the standard key binding on anything to do
> with the current context - in particular, on whether the
> buffer is narrowed.
>
> Please do _not_ bind `M-g M-g' to anything different in Info.
Why not? We do this kind of thing -- have mode-specific bindings --
all the time in Emacs.
> Emacs should not be second-guessing users about this.
It's not second-guessing. Info shows narrowed line numbers in its
buffers, so from the user POV the key sequence keeps invoking the same
command.
I see no problem and don't see why you object so much.
- bug#5042: bug#9917: 24.0.90; Make `goto-line' consistent with the line number from the minibuffer, (continued)
bug#5042: bug#9917: 24.0.90; Make `goto-line' consistent with the line number from the minibuffer, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/09/19
- bug#9917: bug#5042: bug#9917: 24.0.90; Make `goto-line' consistent with the line number from the minibuffer, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2020/09/20
- bug#9917: bug#5042: bug#9917: 24.0.90; Make `goto-line' consistent with the line number from the minibuffer, Juri Linkov, 2020/09/21
- bug#9917: bug#5042: bug#9917: 24.0.90; Make `goto-line' consistent with the line number from the minibuffer, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2020/09/22
- bug#9917: bug#5042: bug#9917: 24.0.90; Make `goto-line' consistent with the line number from the minibuffer, Juri Linkov, 2020/09/22
- bug#5042: bug#9917: 24.0.90; Make `goto-line' consistent with the line number from the minibuffer, Drew Adams, 2020/09/22
- bug#5042: bug#9917: bug#5042: bug#9917: 24.0.90; Make `goto-line' consistent with the line number from the minibuffer,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- bug#9917: bug#5042: bug#9917: 24.0.90; Make `goto-line' consistent with the line number from the minibuffer, Drew Adams, 2020/09/23
- bug#9917: bug#5042: bug#9917: 24.0.90; Make `goto-line' consistent with the line number from the minibuffer, Juri Linkov, 2020/09/23
bug#5042: bug#9917: 24.0.90; Make `goto-line' consistent with the line number from the minibuffer, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2020/09/23
bug#9917: bug#5042: bug#9917: 24.0.90; Make `goto-line' consistent with the line number from the minibuffer, Drew Adams, 2020/09/23
bug#9917: bug#5042: bug#9917: 24.0.90; Make `goto-line' consistent with the line number from the minibuffer, Robert Pluim, 2020/09/24
bug#5042: bug#9917: 24.0.90; Make `goto-line' consistent with the line number from the minibuffer, Drew Adams, 2020/09/24