bug-gnu-emacs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#43597: 28.0.50; arc-mode.el fails to display a ZIP file


From: Stephen Berman
Subject: bug#43597: 28.0.50; arc-mode.el fails to display a ZIP file
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2020 00:20:18 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux)

On Thu, 24 Sep 2020 23:58:51 +0200 Stephen Berman <stephen.berman@gmx.net> 
wrote:

> On Thu, 24 Sep 2020 22:40:15 +0200 Stephen Berman <stephen.berman@gmx.net> 
> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 24 Sep 2020 22:25:23 +0200 Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Sep 24 2020, Stephen Berman wrote:
>>>
>>>> In case it helps, here is the final byte sequence in the file (I've
>>>> replace the control characters and raw bytes by ASCII representations):
>>>>
>>>> PK^E^F\377\377\377\377%^@%^@\377\377\377\377\377\377\377\377^@^@
>>>
>>> That means the archive is in ZIP64 format.  See
>>> <https://pkware.cachefly.net/webdocs/casestudies/APPNOTE.TXT>.  The real
>>> values are contained in the zip64 end of central directory record, which
>>> has "PK\6\6" as the signature.
>>
>> Thanks.  But then it seems that arc-mode.el doesn't handle this format
>> correctly: archive-zip-summarize has this code:
>>
>>   (let ((p (archive-l-e (+ (point) 16) 4))
>>         files)
>>     (when (= p -1)
>>       ;; If the offset of end-of-central-directory is -1, this is a
>>       ;; Zip64 extended ZIP file format, and we need to glean the info
>>       ;; from Zip64 records instead.
>>
>> But the first value returned by archive-l-e for this file is 255, not
>> -1, and on each iteration the value increases, so the ZIP64 code in the
>> body of the when-clause is never executed.
>
> I've confirmed that changing the when-clause condition to (= p
> 4294967295) (that's octal 37777777777, hex ffffffff) makes the body get
> executed and the contents of the problematic ZIP file are correctly
> displayed in archive-mode.  Is that the correct fix?

No, it's not, at least not without additional changes.  I looked at the
display in archive-mode too quickly before; looking again, I see that
each file in the archive is shown as having size 4294967295 and the
total size shown is correspondingly wrong.

Steve Berman





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]