bug-gnu-emacs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#43700: 28.0.50; Crash creating a second frame


From: Andy Moreton
Subject: bug#43700: 28.0.50; Crash creating a second frame
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2020 15:49:41 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.0

On 29/09/2020 15:37, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
From: Andy Moreton <andrewjmoreton@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2020 11:46:48 +0100

After loading emacs (and files saved by desktop), do C-x 5 2 to create a
new frame. Emacs crashes, and gdb shows the following backtrace.

Is this repeatable?  Does it happen with "emacs -Q", per chance?  Or
with unoptimized builds?

It is repeatable occasionally, but I don't yet have a recipe to reproduce it reliably.

It doesn't seem to happen from "emacs -Q", or from emacs --no-desktop" but it may be that I have not tried enough times to trigger it.

This seems to have something to do with toolbars, but ~/.emacs.d/init.el
contains "(tool-bar-mode 0)" so it shouldn't be doing anything with toolbars.

Creating a frame makes a keymap for the tool bar, whether it's
displayed or not.

But look at this part:

#9  0x00000004001e76b1 in FACE_FROM_ID (id=0x162880, f=0x154e25ed5d860000) at
C:/emacs/git/emacs/master/src/frame.h:1460
No locals.
#10 lookup_image (f=0x154e25ed5d860000, f@entry=0x6edbab0, spec=XIL(0),
spec@entry=XIL(0xcd2b873), face_id=0x162880, face_id@entry=0xffffffff) at
C:/emacs/git/emacs/master/src/image.c:2332
          img = <optimized out>
          hash = <optimized out>
          face = <optimized out>
          foreground = <optimized out>
          background = <optimized out>
#11 0x00000004001e8235 in Fimage_mask_p (spec=XIL(0xcd2b873), frame=XIL(0)) at
C:/emacs/git/emacs/master/src/image.c:1114
          f = 0x6edbab0

Look at the reasonable values of the arguments at entry to
lookup_image, and the garbled values at the crash site.  The line that
calls FACE_FROM_ID is the first executable line of lookup_image, so
this could have happened only if the optimizations moved some
non-trivial code between the entry to the function and that line.  Or
maybe something else is at work here.

Something is definitely fishy. Perhaps a full bootstrap might fix it.

    AndyM






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]