[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#43834: 27.1; [PATCH] Sentinels under X and command line
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#43834: 27.1; [PATCH] Sentinels under X and command line |
Date: |
Wed, 07 Oct 2020 09:39:28 +0300 |
> From: dick.r.chiang@gmail.com
> Cc: 43834@debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2020 15:16:13 -0400
>
> Maintainer(s),
>
> The `emacs -Q` invocation demonstrates the process sentinel never fires upon
> the completion of the sleep `start-process`. Note this failure only occurs
> under X and when evaluating from the command line via `--eval` or `--funcall`.
Thanks, I figured out that much. What I was asking for was a more
detailed explanation why you propose to make the specific changes in
your patches to fix that problem. IOW, how is the change in xsmfns.c
supposed to remedy the problem you describe above?
TIA
- bug#43834: 27.1; [PATCH] Sentinels under X and command line, dick, 2020/10/06
- bug#43834: 27.1; [PATCH] Sentinels under X and command line, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/10/06
- bug#43834: 27.1; [PATCH] Sentinels under X and command line, dick . r . chiang, 2020/10/06
- bug#43834: 27.1; [PATCH] Sentinels under X and command line,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- bug#43834: 27.1; [PATCH] Sentinels under X and command line, dick . r . chiang, 2020/10/07
- bug#43834: 27.1; [PATCH] Sentinels under X and command line, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/10/07
- bug#43834: 27.1; [PATCH] Sentinels under X and command line, dick . r . chiang, 2020/10/07
- bug#43834: 27.1; [PATCH] Sentinels under X and command line, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/10/07
- bug#43834: 27.1; [PATCH] Sentinels under X and command line, dick . r . chiang, 2020/10/07
- bug#43834: 27.1; [PATCH] Sentinels under X and command line, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/10/07