bug#44018: Don't consider play-sound-file to be a 'safe' function

[Lars Ingebrigtsen]

Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:

> I don't "object" object, I just prefer to end the discussion and reach
> some conclusions before "shots are fired".  I'd like to hear Lars's
> opinions on the questions I asked in my last message.

I didn't really have any opinions beyond what I already said -- that
reading the code and looking and the changes, it seemed to me that the
purpose of unsafep.el was to list functions that are absolutely 100%
"safe" to use (i.e., no very noticeable side effects).

So the logic seems to be "kinda like side-effect-free, but from a user
point of view".  And neither message nor play-sound-file fit those
criteria.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no