bug#45688: 28.0.50; New action for display-buffer?

[Lars Ingebrigtsen]

martin rudalics <rudalics@gmx.at> writes:

> We're asking too much from 'display-buffer' here.  It can't second-guess
> a user's intentions in particular with the interpretation of grep and
> xref hits.  I see three basic patterns here:

I'm wondering whether there should be a separate
`display-buffer-command' that's bound to `C-x 4 C-o' with its own
display rules.  :-)  That is, when the user is using this command
explicitly, then it's not obvious that the user wants the same rules as
with the "automatic" display-buffer stuff (popping from *grep* buffers
and the like).

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no