[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#46111: Reverting fns.c hash function due to OpenBSD/SPARC64 compile
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#46111: Reverting fns.c hash function due to OpenBSD/SPARC64 compile breaking |
Date: |
Tue, 26 Jan 2021 13:43:47 +0200 |
User-agent: |
K-9 Mail for Android |
On January 26, 2021 1:17:06 PM GMT+02:00, Andreas Schwab
<schwab@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
> On Jan 26 2021, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>
> > It's definitely legal, as it doesn't violate any laws...
>
> It violates the laws of C.
We call that "invalid" not "illegal".
- bug#46111: Reverting fns.c hash function due to OpenBSD/SPARC64 compile breaking, (continued)
- bug#46111: Reverting fns.c hash function due to OpenBSD/SPARC64 compile breaking, Stefan Monnier, 2021/01/28
- bug#46111: Reverting fns.c hash function due to OpenBSD/SPARC64 compile breaking, Stefan Monnier, 2021/01/28
- bug#46111: Reverting fns.c hash function due to OpenBSD/SPARC64 compile breaking, Andreas Schwab, 2021/01/28
- bug#46111: Reverting fns.c hash function due to OpenBSD/SPARC64 compile breaking, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/01/28
- bug#46111: Reverting fns.c hash function due to OpenBSD/SPARC64 compile breaking, Stefan Monnier, 2021/01/28
- bug#46111: Reverting fns.c hash function due to OpenBSD/SPARC64 compile breaking, Andreas Schwab, 2021/01/28
- bug#46111: Reverting fns.c hash function due to OpenBSD/SPARC64 compile breaking, Stefan Monnier, 2021/01/28
bug#46111: Reverting fns.c hash function due to OpenBSD/SPARC64 compile breaking, Philipp Stephani, 2021/01/26
bug#46111: Reverting fns.c hash function due to OpenBSD/SPARC64 compile breaking, Richard Stallman, 2021/01/27
bug#46111: Reverting fns.c hash function due to OpenBSD/SPARC64 compile breaking, Andreas Schwab, 2021/01/27