bug#35466: 26.2; Feature request: add clone-indirect-buffer-other-frame to C-x 5 c

[Lars Ingebrigtsen]

Juri Linkov <juri@linkov.net> writes:

> The only problem with this binding is that bug#34715 proposed
> to use the same binding C-x 5 c for clone-frame.

That hasn't happened...  but I'm not quite sure that this would be
generally useful.  That is, adding -other-buffer and -other-frame
variations to a bunch of commands doesn't seem like a good long-term
design solution -- solving this instead through `display-buffer-alist'
etc seems more scalable.

So I'm closing this as a "wontfix".

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no