[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#46368: Completion vs. "*" buffer names
From: |
積丹尼 Dan Jacobson |
Subject: |
bug#46368: Completion vs. "*" buffer names |
Date: |
Mon, 08 Feb 2021 00:52:04 +0800 |
Look at the bottom line of the image.
Here we see completion will never work,
because the "*" is missing from the start of the string.
(Our cursor is at the end of the line there at the bottom.)
How did we end up this way?
Well we just hit "un<TAB>".
emacs-version "27.1"
- bug#46368: Completion vs. "*" buffer names,
積丹尼 Dan Jacobson <=
- bug#46368: Completion vs. "*" buffer names, Gregory Heytings, 2021/02/08
- bug#46368: Completion vs. "*" buffer names, 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson, 2021/02/09
- bug#46368: Completion vs. "*" buffer names, Gregory Heytings, 2021/02/09
- bug#46368: Completion vs. "*" buffer names, 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson, 2021/02/09
- bug#46368: Completion vs. "*" buffer names, Gregory Heytings, 2021/02/10
- bug#46368: Completion vs. "*" buffer names, 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson, 2021/02/10
- bug#46368: Completion vs. "*" buffer names, Gregory Heytings, 2021/02/10
- bug#46368: Completion vs. "*" buffer names, 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson, 2021/02/10