bug-gnu-emacs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#46441: GNU ELPA feature request: host .lz archives (as well as uncom


From: Mauricio Collares
Subject: bug#46441: GNU ELPA feature request: host .lz archives (as well as uncompressed) for current versions
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 15:41:13 -0300
User-agent: mu4e 1.4.13; emacs 28.0.50

Basil L. Contovounesios <contovob@tcd.ie> writes:

> [CCing the GNU ELPA maintainer.]
>
> Mauricio Collares <mauricio@collares.org> writes:
>
>> Currently, there's no way to get a permanent link to a package version
>> that happens to be the current one. For example, auctex is currently at
>> version 13.0.4; today I can download it from
>> https://elpa.gnu.org/packages/auctex-13.0.4.tar, but this link will stop
>> working as soon as a new version of auctex is released and the old
>> version gets compressed. This makes it slightly annoying to pin a
>> particular version of an ELPA package by URL.
>>
>> I would like to ask the GNU ELPA maintainers to host both
>> https://elpa.gnu.org/packages/PACKAGE-CURRENTVERSION.lz (permanent) as
>> well as https://elpa.gnu.org/packagesa/PACKAGE-CURRENTVERSION
>> (temporary). This would make it easier for people to build reproducible
>> environments by pinning a package version. I don't particularly care
>> about exposing it as a link on the website; for my purposes, it's enough
>> that the file exists. This is perhaps a little bit wasteful, but
>> compressed versions shouldn't be too big.
>
> Wouldn't it be wasteless if the "current version" URL was symbolic and
> resolved to the concrete versioned release?


Hi Basil,

Thanks for taking the time to reply! I think my use of "CURRENTVERSION"
in the previous email URL was ambiguous. Concretely, what I want to have
is to be able to fetch auctex 13.0.4 (which, as of 2021-02-12 is the
current version) through a URL that will still serve the exact same file
(auctex 13.0.4, and ideally same sha256) a year from now. If I
understand correctly, your suggestion gives a link that always points to
the newest version, due to ambiguity in my previous email. I apologize
for the confusion.

Best,
Mauricio





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]