[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#46688: 27.1; Best to still say "0 minutes"
From: |
積丹尼 Dan Jacobson |
Subject: |
bug#46688: 27.1; Best to still say "0 minutes" |
Date: |
Sun, 21 Feb 2021 03:26:28 +0800 |
Regarding gnus-article-date-headers '(combined-local-lapsed) etc.
When one is used to the first format below, and then, there is a 1/60
Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2021 09:40:24 +0800 (17 hours, 36 minutes, 1 second ago)
Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2021 10:15:02 +0800 (17 hours, 54 seconds ago)
chance it will be the second format, and their ^
"brain has a heart attack" right there ^
because someone slipped the seconds into where ^
the minutes usually are. "54 minutes? The ^
professor has already gone home! Oh no." ^
And by this time your read this they are already ^
dead.
- bug#46688: 27.1; Best to still say "0 minutes",
積丹尼 Dan Jacobson <=