|
From: | Gregory Heytings |
Subject: | bug#48193: Youngsters in charge of emacs vs. basic Bourne shell "for" statement |
Date: | Mon, 03 May 2021 17:13:12 +0000 |
$ man bash SHELL GRAMMAR for name [ [ in [ word ... ] ] ; ] do list ; done
So what? Of course it it's not feasible to embed a complete Bourne shell interpreter (or for that matter the interpreter of any language) in Emacs to cope with every possible exotic construct of that language. I note that
for i do true done and for i; do true done are both indented as you expect.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |