[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#48221: 28.0.50; defsubsts aren't native compiled?
From: |
Andrea Corallo |
Subject: |
bug#48221: 28.0.50; defsubsts aren't native compiled? |
Date: |
Tue, 04 May 2021 16:03:34 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> writes:
> The following test has been failing the past few days.
>
> 1 unexpected results:
> FAILED help-fns-test-lisp-defsubst
>
> And, indeed, `C-h f' on the subst in question says:
>
> posn-window is a compiled Lisp function in ‘subr.el’.
>
> While a regular function is native compiled:
>
> last is a native compiled Lisp function in ‘subr.el’.
Hi Lars,
AFAIR having the defsubst non native compiled is what we want as we need
the bytecode definition to have the inline to be performed. Actually
the test is verifying that the defsubst is *not* native compiled.
I tried to reproduce here (0c993ed1d3) but for me the test is passing,
that's odd...
Thanks
Andrea
- bug#48221: 28.0.50; defsubsts aren't native compiled?, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/05/04
- bug#48221: 28.0.50; defsubsts aren't native compiled?,
Andrea Corallo <=
- bug#48221: 28.0.50; defsubsts aren't native compiled?, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/05/05
- bug#48221: 28.0.50; defsubsts aren't native compiled?, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/05/05
- bug#48221: 28.0.50; defsubsts aren't native compiled?, Andrea Corallo, 2021/05/05
- bug#48221: 28.0.50; defsubsts aren't native compiled?, Andrea Corallo, 2021/05/05
- bug#48221: 28.0.50; defsubsts aren't native compiled?, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/05/05
- bug#48221: 28.0.50; defsubsts aren't native compiled?, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/05/05
- bug#48221: 28.0.50; defsubsts aren't native compiled?, Andrea Corallo, 2021/05/05
- bug#48221: 28.0.50; defsubsts aren't native compiled?, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/05/05
- bug#48221: 28.0.50; defsubsts aren't native compiled?, Andrea Corallo, 2021/05/05
- bug#48221: 28.0.50; defsubsts aren't native compiled?, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/05/05