|
From: | Jeff B |
Subject: | bug#49050: 26.1; The INSANITY of setting a default font size in EMACS and saving it for future instances. |
Date: | Thu, 17 Jun 2021 14:48:52 -0400 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0 |
My response is down below at the end.
Such changes in the defaults will need to be requested by much more than a single individual, for them to be considered seriously.Why me? I have enough on my plate already, and starting a discussion needs neither my consent nor my help.On 6/17/21 10:13 AM, Christopher Dimech wrote: So me starting a discussion does not require your consent nor your help. I shall take you up on that and start discussing. The suggestion was mainly driven by the previous comment that my requests are not considered seriously. This is not always a healthy solution to inactivity.The decision to add an "Accessibility" toggle, which is off by default, is a much easier one, and given that someone writes the code, should be a no-brainer to install. No discussion is needed for that.Let's do the no-brainer and see how that goes. An accessibility option is good, but need an easy way to enable it after installing emacs. I suggest an "Initial Option" such as "emacs -A", together with an elisp command "(accessibility 1)". Jeff, what do you think about this? Would it be a good 70th birthday present? Felicitations Christopher
Since you ask I will answer. • I would NOT use an Initial Option such as "emacs -A" because that means that you would have had to read the man page to know that -the A option is there. The Emacs 26.1 man page is already 473 lines long. If someone is having a hard time seeing to begin with then expecting them to read their way through all that to look for something they don't know is there is not exactly accessibility-friendly. • Instead I would add an accessibility item either as an item to the Options menu or, better still, add it as a separate item to the menu bar. That would make it easy to stumble upon. :-) • Which brings me to another point. I accept that I probably have some weirdness in my environment which causes Save Options to fail, so solving that problem is probably on me. BUT since saving options has never worked for me I am particularly sensitive to the issue of saving options. As I understand it (because it has never worked for me) to save options chosen one not only has to make changes somewhere under the Options item but then one has to re-enter the Options menu and explicitly save the changes. If it were up to me I'd reorganize that so that each Options menu item had Cancel, Apply and Save buttons so that you can save right then and there. HOWEVER I recognize that would be a major refactoring of the code (I have been a hard-core programmer all of my professional life!) which would take a lot of work so it probably won't happen. BUT, as I said, if it were up to me I'd do it. • Responding to a comment in an earlier eMail, YES, the default font size IS TOO SMALL to be accessibility-friendly. It is far easier for a person who has good vision to make the text smaller than it is for a vision-impaired person to make the text bigger. I know all about wanting to cram more lines and columns of code into a frame. I used to have 20/20 vision and made the characters as small as possible so I could have more lines of code visible on my screen at any one time. Then I got older and, as happens to many people, I lost my ability to focus rather suddenly at about 45 years of age. Assuming that you do make it to "older", then you may also discover, personally, how important accessibility features really are. So I urge you to get them in place BEFORE you need them, and in the meantime making it easier for all of the people who already have sight impairment. Thank you, Jeff Barry Old Fart and Curmudgeon-In-Training PS: Fix the EMACS documentation problem with jargon too!
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |