bug#49116: 28.0.50; Why `bound-and-true-p' is not working in lexical binding?

[Lars Ingebrigtsen]

Michael Heerdegen <michael_heerdegen@web.de> writes:

> Maybe we can further improve the text to something like "not meaningful
> in the scope of a lexical binding of the variable" or something like
> that?

But I don't think that's correct, because the function takes a symbol
that refers to a variable -- and not a variable.  :-)

Explaining why something doesn't make sense is often more complicate
than explaining how something works.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no