[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#49742: 28.0.50; previous-single-property-change sometimes wrong?
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#49742: 28.0.50; previous-single-property-change sometimes wrong? |
Date: |
Mon, 26 Jul 2021 21:59:09 +0300 |
> From: "T.V Raman" <raman@google.com>
> Cc: 49742@debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2021 10:19:13 -0700
>
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>
>
> See below for the results you ask. It does not explain itself because
> property 'face is nil at positions 30 and 29.
Yes, it's nil. So that is the last position before 'H' where the
value of the 'face' property changes -- from transient-inactive-value
to nil. Which is why the function returns that position.
If this still doesn't explain the results, please tell what is missing
from the explanation.
- bug#49742: 28.0.50; previous-single-property-change sometimes wrong?, T.V Raman, 2021/07/26
- bug#49742: 28.0.50; previous-single-property-change sometimes wrong?, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/07/26
- bug#49742: 28.0.50; previous-single-property-change sometimes wrong?, T.V Raman, 2021/07/26
- bug#49742: 28.0.50; previous-single-property-change sometimes wrong?,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- bug#49742: 28.0.50; previous-single-property-change sometimes wrong?, T.V Raman, 2021/07/26
- bug#49742: 28.0.50; previous-single-property-change sometimes wrong?, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/07/26
- bug#49742: 28.0.50; previous-single-property-change sometimes wrong?, T.V Raman, 2021/07/26
- bug#49742: 28.0.50; previous-single-property-change sometimes wrong?, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/07/27
- bug#49742: 28.0.50; previous-single-property-change sometimes wrong?, T.V Raman, 2021/07/27
- bug#49742: 28.0.50; previous-single-property-change sometimes wrong?, Andreas Schwab, 2021/07/27
- bug#49742: 28.0.50; previous-single-property-change sometimes wrong?, T.V Raman, 2021/07/27
- bug#49742: 28.0.50; previous-single-property-change sometimes wrong?, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/07/27
- bug#49742: 28.0.50; previous-single-property-change sometimes wrong?, T.V Raman, 2021/07/27