|
From: | Dmitry Gutov |
Subject: | bug#50459: 28.0.50; Python shell completion is incompatible with flex, orderless, etc. |
Date: | Fri, 10 Sep 2021 16:28:52 +0300 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0 |
On 10.09.2021 16:14, João Távora wrote:
- If you're OK with letting the server do the filtering and the highlighting, you can make a "backend" style like I did for SLY, for example. It's going to be faster, but `completion-styles` won't be honoured. That's doesn't mean you give up 100% on "flex". In SLY, there is flex implemented on the Common Lisp side, and for Eglot, many LSP server do their own flex matching.
You can't really do that with python-shell completion. Nor do you need do: the basic pcmpl mechanism should work just fine with it, and for performance the completion table just needs some smarter caching.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |