[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#50727: Contradictory conventions with new command kbd-macro-display
From: |
Marco Wahl |
Subject: |
bug#50727: Contradictory conventions with new command kbd-macro-display |
Date: |
Wed, 22 Sep 2021 08:58:45 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
Stefan Kangas <stefan@marxist.se> writes:
> Gregory Heytings <gregory@heytings.org> writes:
>
>> It's 'kbd-macro-redisplay', not 'kbd-macro-display'.
>
> Sorry, yes: `kbd-macro-redisplay'.
>
>> Indeed it conflicts with the keys that are supposed to be reserved for
>> user bindings, but it is by far not the only one:
>>
>> C-x C-k Q kdb-macro-redisplay
>> C-x C-k b kmacro-bind-to-key
>> C-x C-k e edit-kbd-macro
>> C-x C-k l kmacro-edit-lossage
>> C-x C-k n kmacro-name-last-macro
>> C-x C-k q kbd-macro-query
>> C-x C-k r apply-macro-to-region-lines
>> C-x C-k s kmacro-start-macro
>> C-x C-k x kmacro-to-register
>
> I believe only the first one of these breaks the convention, as it is
> the only one to use an upper-case letter.
Thanks for pointing out the issue!
Now what to do?
What about dropping key sequence C-x C-k Q and use C-x C-k d instead?
Or even dropping that key sequence entirey?
I vote for keeping a key sequence for kdb-macro-redisplay, tho.