[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#50630: [PATCH] Add tests for insert-directory
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#50630: [PATCH] Add tests for insert-directory |
Date: |
Sat, 25 Sep 2021 20:26:22 +0300 |
> Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2021 17:15:21 +0000
> From: John Cummings <john@rootabega.net>
> Cc: 50630@debbugs.gnu.org
>
> >> I and others found that the same problem was duplicated in ls-lisp.el
> >> and tramp-sh.el, and I provided instructions to reproduce attached
> >> earlier in the thread:
> >> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnu-emacs/2021-09/msg01813.html
>
> > That recipe invokes insert-directory in some arbitrary way, which is
> > probably different from what happens when one invokes Dired. So I'm
> > not sure we should worry about that. But anyway, I tried that recipe
> > on MS-Windows, and I don't see the problem: the values shown on the
> > first line reflect my home directory, not pwd-a or pwd-b.
>
> I'm replying only to this part for now, because we need to agree on
> the facts in order to do anything else. If what you say is accurate,
> then this bug may not really exist as I've described it, but I think
> I've done everything reasonable to eliminate that possibility. Are you
> sure that you picked values for pwd-a and pwd-b that would have
> different amounts of available space on MS-Windows, like two drive
> letters on physically separate disks?
No, they were 2 different directories on the same drive.
Maybe I don't understand which part of the totals you want to fix:
there are two numbers there.
> I tried to supply values for pwd-a and pwd-b that would be under
> different mount points on a Unix-like system, / and /proc, but if your
> system is different, you may need to pick different Unix-like values
> for those, too.
I indeed provided different values, but not on different volumes.
What is the significance of a different volume for this purpose?
> I just built 285f59cbe230701f15d28dfe8036cf2feb9d1d31 (terminal only)
> from a brand new git clone on Ubuntu 20,and here are the results of
> the recipes. I'll use a "[" character to quote the text I copied off
> my terminal:
Thanks, but it's hard to interpret that. What should I be looking at?
Do we agree that listing a given directory should show the same amount
of used and free space, not matter what is the default-directory of
the buffer from which you invoke insert-directory? Because that's
what I saw after running your recipe.
- bug#50630: [PATCH] Add tests for insert-directory, (continued)
bug#50630: [PATCH] Add tests for insert-directory, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/09/25
- bug#50630: [PATCH] Add tests for insert-directory, John Cummings, 2021/09/25
- bug#50630: [PATCH] Add tests for insert-directory, John Cummings, 2021/09/25
- bug#50630: [PATCH] Add tests for insert-directory, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/09/25
- bug#50630: [PATCH] Add tests for insert-directory, John Cummings, 2021/09/25
- bug#50630: [PATCH] Add tests for insert-directory, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/09/25
- bug#50630: [PATCH] Add tests for insert-directory, John Cummings, 2021/09/25
- bug#50630: [PATCH] Add tests for insert-directory,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- bug#50630: [PATCH] Add tests for insert-directory, John Cummings, 2021/09/25
- bug#50630: [PATCH] Add tests for insert-directory, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/09/25
- bug#50630: [PATCH] Add tests for insert-directory, John Cummings, 2021/09/25
- bug#50630: [PATCH] Add tests for insert-directory, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/09/25
- bug#50630: [PATCH] Add tests for insert-directory, John Cummings, 2021/09/25
- bug#50630: [PATCH] Add tests for insert-directory, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/09/25
- bug#50630: [PATCH] Add tests for insert-directory, John Cummings, 2021/09/25