bug#51596: image-transform-resize has inconsistent semantics wrt scaling up/down

[Lars Ingebrigtsen]

Stefan Kangas <stefan@marxist.se> writes:

> "Fit height" and "fit width" both scales an image up or down, but "fit
> height and width" only scales an image down.  Is that intentional?

Yes, I think so?  The point of the latter is that too-big images are
pretty useless -- you want to scale them down so that you can actually
see them.  But it doesn't therefore follow that you want to scale tiny
icons up to fill the screen.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no