[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#51661: 29.0.50; What is "interactive Lisp closure"?
From: |
Lars Ingebrigtsen |
Subject: |
bug#51661: 29.0.50; What is "interactive Lisp closure"? |
Date: |
Sun, 07 Nov 2021 15:10:22 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
> No. But emoji.el says this:
>
> (insert ";; Local" " Variables:
> ;; coding: utf-8
> ;; version-control: never
> ;; no-byte-compile: t
> ;; no-update-autoloads: t
> ;; End:
>
> (provide 'emoji-labels)
>
> and that trips the 'compile-main' target in lisp/Makefile to think
> this file should not be byte-compiled.
D'oh. I thought my obfuscation there was sufficient. I'll get fixing.
> I think we should replace "closure" by "function" in the Help buffer.
> There's no need to show this to users.
Let's see... it's this code? I'm guessing Stefan M wrote this, so I'm
adding him to the CCs.
(defun help-fns-function-description-header (function)
"Print a line describing FUNCTION to `standard-output'."
(pcase-let* ((`(,_real-function ,def ,aliased ,real-def)
(help-fns--analyze-function function))
(file-name (find-lisp-object-file-name function (if aliased
'defun
def)))
(beg (if (and (or (byte-code-function-p def)
(keymapp def)
(memq (car-safe def) '(macro lambda closure)))
(stringp file-name)
(help-fns--autoloaded-p function file-name))
(concat
"an autoloaded " (if (commandp def)
"interactive "))
(if (commandp def) "an interactive " "a "))))
I don't really have an opinion. I agree that "closure"/"lambda" here is
probably more information than most users have asked for, but on the
other hand, it's a reality, so how much of the details should we hide?
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
bug#51661: 29.0.50; What is "interactive Lisp closure"?, Andreas Schwab, 2021/11/07