[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#51734: 29.0.50; got slow
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#51734: 29.0.50; got slow |
Date: |
Fri, 12 Nov 2021 21:26:32 +0200 |
> Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2021 13:22:28 -0500
> Cc: yamaoka@jpl.org, 51734@debbugs.gnu.org
> From: Ken Brown <kbrown@cornell.edu>
>
> The only thing I can think of is that Cygwin is probably the only system that
> has timerfd and that also has to use timers to poll for input. (The others
> all
> use SIGIO, if I'm not mistaken.) By using two different kinds of timers
> simultaneously, we're getting timers expiring twice as often and not at
> regular
> intervals. Could this account for the slowdown?
At what frequency does the other timer tick, the one used to poll for
input?
> In any case, I think I should go ahead and install the patch to make the
> master
> branch usable again on Cygwin.
Feel free.
- bug#51734: 29.0.50; got slow, (continued)
- bug#51734: 29.0.50; got slow, Ken Brown, 2021/11/11
- bug#51734: 29.0.50; got slow, Ken Brown, 2021/11/11
- bug#51734: 29.0.50; got slow, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/11/11
- bug#51734: 29.0.50; got slow, Ken Brown, 2021/11/11
- bug#51734: 29.0.50; got slow, Ken Brown, 2021/11/11
- bug#51734: 29.0.50; got slow, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/11/11
- bug#51734: 29.0.50; got slow, Ken Brown, 2021/11/11
- bug#51734: 29.0.50; got slow, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/11/11
- bug#51734: 29.0.50; got slow, Katsumi Yamaoka, 2021/11/11
- bug#51734: 29.0.50; got slow, Ken Brown, 2021/11/12
- bug#51734: 29.0.50; got slow,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- bug#51734: 29.0.50; got slow, Ken Brown, 2021/11/12
- bug#51734: 29.0.50; got slow, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/11/13
- bug#51734: 29.0.50; got slow, Ken Brown, 2021/11/14
- bug#51734: 29.0.50; got slow, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/11/14
- bug#51734: 29.0.50; got slow, Ken Brown, 2021/11/14