bug#51935: 29.0.50; tab-switch hides identically named tabs

[Carlos Pita]

Hi Juri,

> But the problem is that 'C-x t RET' is used mostly when the tab-bar
> is disabled and not visible, so tabs are not positional in this case.

But there still is the underlying order used by C-TAB/S-C-TAB, isn't it?

Depending on the configured completion framework C-x t RET will show
candidates in order or not, but the interpretation of the suffix as a
position seems relatively clear to me even in the unordered case, if
not anything else at least it's an indication that there are
additional tabs with the same name.

Best regards,
Carlos