bug#52018: 28.0.60; Improve documentation for compilation-finish-functions

[Lars Ingebrigtsen]

Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:

>> > If the purpose is to provide the exit status to the function, we need
>> > to take care to pass it without any massaging.  We don't make a point
>> > of doing that now, so I'd prefer not to document this in such certain
>> > terms, as people will then complain that it isn't 100% accurate.
>> 
>> Thanks for the clarification. This makes sense, I'm just not sure how to
>> act on this.  Would you rather drop this change or modify it to use more
>> cautious language?  
>
> Not sure, actually.  Lars, WDYT?

The string that's passed in is a pretty free-form string, so I'm not
sure what we could say about it in the manual that'd be meaningful.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no