[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#52063: 28.0.60; Confusing presentation of lambda
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#52063: 28.0.60; Confusing presentation of lambda |
Date: |
Wed, 24 Nov 2021 14:48:45 +0200 |
> From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>
> Cc: 52063@debbugs.gnu.org, Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
> Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2021 08:35:30 +0100
>
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>
> > . The result:
> >
> > ((closure (t) nil (setq flyspell-generic-check-word-p
> > 'mail-mode-flyspell-verify)))
> >
> > Why are we present a simple lambda as a closure? why confuse users
> > with something tricky instead of showing the lambda-form the user
> > typed?
>
> I'm not sure what you're suggesting here. The key is bound to a
> closure
Which key? I evaluated an add-hook expression.
What I want to see is my lambda, the one I put in the hook.
> (If you switch lexical-binding off in *scratch* it won't be.)
I doubt that we want to tell users to switch off lexical-binding to
see reasonably-formatted results from evaluation.
- bug#52063: 28.0.60; Confusing presentation of lambda, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/11/23
- bug#52063: 28.0.60; Confusing presentation of lambda, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/11/24
- bug#52063: 28.0.60; Confusing presentation of lambda,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- bug#52063: 28.0.60; Confusing presentation of lambda, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/11/24
- bug#52063: 28.0.60; Confusing presentation of lambda, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/11/24
- bug#52063: 28.0.60; Confusing presentation of lambda, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/11/24
- bug#52063: 28.0.60; Confusing presentation of lambda, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/11/24
- bug#52063: 28.0.60; Confusing presentation of lambda, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/11/24
- bug#52063: 28.0.60; Confusing presentation of lambda, Stefan Monnier, 2021/11/24
- bug#52063: 28.0.60; Confusing presentation of lambda, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/11/24
- bug#52063: 28.0.60; Confusing presentation of lambda, Stefan Monnier, 2021/11/24
- bug#52063: 28.0.60; Confusing presentation of lambda, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/11/24
- bug#52063: 28.0.60; Confusing presentation of lambda, Stefan Monnier, 2021/11/24