[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#53193: 29.0.50; gud bombs
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#53193: 29.0.50; gud bombs |
Date: |
Tue, 11 Jan 2022 22:14:55 +0200 |
> Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2022 14:24:21 -0500
> From: Devon Sean McCullough <Emacs-Hacker2020@jovi.net>
>
> (defun gud-tooltip-tips …
> (cons 'and gud-tooltip-display)
>
> ;; should be more like
>
> (defun gud-tooltip-tips …
> (cons 'and (mapcar (lambda (form)
> (list 'ignore-errors form))
> gud-tooltip-display))
>
> ;; a workaround is
>
> (setq gud-tooltip-display
> '((and gud-overlay-arrow-position
> (eq (tooltip-event-buffer gud-tooltip-event)
> (marker-buffer gud-overlay-arrow-position)))))
Could you please show the minimal recipe for reproducing the problem?
> ;; P.S. Should gud be fixed or flushed in favor of realgud?
It is basically deprecated in favor of gdb-mi. But some people still
prefer gud.el.
> ;; P.P.S. Should gud-lldb.el be incorporated into gud?
No, we don't want to develop gud.el, we want to develop gdb-mi.el
instead. So if LLDB developers get their act together and provide
decent support for the GDB/MI interface, LLDB users could simply use
the existing gdb-mi.el.