bug#53227: master: Wrong error message with M-: (funcall).

[Stefan Monnier]

>>     (`(funcall . ,_) form)            ;bug#53227
>>
>> is then present to make sure the first change doesn't worsen the
>> rest of the resulting macroexpanded code.
>
> I don't understand.  How much better than (funcall) can it get?

I'm not talking about the quality of the code output by
`macroexp--expand-all` but about the quality of the code *of*
`macroexp--expand-all`.


        Stefan