bug#51733: 27.1; Detect impossible email addresses better

[Lars Ingebrigtsen]

Robert Pluim <rpluim@gmail.com> writes:

> (textsec-email-suspicious-p "דגבאa <foo@bar.com>")

That is not a valid email address.

> Since itʼs now open season on display names and mailbox names, the
> following might be enough. Lars?

No, that function parses well-formed email addresses, as defined by the
standards.  It does not do any kind of DWIM or guesswork, and it
shouldn't.

(textsec-email-suspicious-p "דגבאa <foo@bar.com>")

shouldn't bug out, though -- it should instead say that the string is
suspicious because it's not well-formed as an email address. 

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no