bug#46351: 28.0.50; Add convenient way to bypass Eshell's own pipelining

[Sean Whitton]

Hello,

On Mon 24 Jan 2022 at 10:55AM +01, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote:

> This leads to:
>
> Test em-extpipe-test-14 condition:
>     (ert-test-failed
>      ((should
>        (string-match-p regexp
>                      (buffer-substring-no-properties ... ...)))
>       :form
>       (string-match-p "baz\nbar" "bazbar\n")
>       :value nil))
>    FAILED   6/16  em-extpipe-test-14 (0.119788 sec)

I apologies for neglecting to run the tests in batch mode.  There was an
implicit dependency on my setting for require-final-newline.  Now fixed.

On Mon 24 Jan 2022 at 03:18PM +01, Michael Albinus wrote:

>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/test/lisp/eshell/eshell-tests-helpers.el
>> @@ -0,0 +1,90 @@
>> +(provide 'eshell-tests)
>> +
>> +;;; eshell-tests.el ends here
>
> This shall be eshell-tests-helpers in both cases.

Likewise fixed in the attached.

Thank you both.

-- 
Sean Whitton

v5-0001-Move-Eshell-test-helpers-to-their-own-file.patch
Description: Text Data

v5-0002-Rework-eshell-match-result-for-testing-asynchrono.patch
Description: Text Data

v5-0003-Add-Eshell-syntax-to-more-easily-bypass-Eshell-s-.patch
Description: Text Data