[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#53452: 29.0.50; C-<arrow> selection broken by translate-upper-case-k
From: |
Robert Pluim |
Subject: |
bug#53452: 29.0.50; C-<arrow> selection broken by translate-upper-case-key-bindings |
Date: |
Tue, 25 Jan 2022 13:37:13 +0100 |
>>>>> On Tue, 25 Jan 2022 14:29:56 +0200, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> said:
>> From: Robert Pluim <rpluim@gmail.com>
>> So either we fix the behaviour, or the documentation. Would it be that
>> hard to restrict this to something like [a-z] or !function key? Or we
>> could always add yet-another-user-option.
Eli> My point was that the behavior is probably okay, and the documentation
Eli> should be amended if it could confuse.
Itʼs only ok if weʼre ok with shift-selection being broken by it. Are
we?
Robert
--
- bug#53452: 29.0.50; C-<arrow> selection broken by translate-upper-case-key-bindings, Ergus, 2022/01/22
- bug#53452: 29.0.50; C-<arrow> selection broken by translate-upper-case-key-bindings, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/01/22
- bug#53452: 29.0.50; C-<arrow> selection broken by translate-upper-case-key-bindings, Robert Pluim, 2022/01/24
- bug#53452: 29.0.50; C-<arrow> selection broken by translate-upper-case-key-bindings, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/01/24
- bug#53452: 29.0.50; C-<arrow> selection broken by translate-upper-case-key-bindings, Robert Pluim, 2022/01/24
- bug#53452: 29.0.50; C-<arrow> selection broken by translate-upper-case-key-bindings, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/01/24
- bug#53452: 29.0.50; C-<arrow> selection broken by translate-upper-case-key-bindings, Robert Pluim, 2022/01/25
- bug#53452: 29.0.50; C-<arrow> selection broken by translate-upper-case-key-bindings, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/01/25
- bug#53452: 29.0.50; C-<arrow> selection broken by translate-upper-case-key-bindings,
Robert Pluim <=
- bug#53452: 29.0.50; C-<arrow> selection broken by translate-upper-case-key-bindings, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/01/25