[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#24902: Antw: [EXT] Re: bug#24902: 25.1; C‑x = for Unicode
From: |
Ulrich Windl |
Subject: |
bug#24902: Antw: [EXT] Re: bug#24902: 25.1; C‑x = for Unicode |
Date: |
Thu, 27 Jan 2022 14:24:06 +0100 |
>>> Mattias Engdegård <mattiase@acm.org> schrieb am 27.01.2022 um 13:38 in
Nachricht <D42E8275-DF4E-4727-8958-A301A77FE703@acm.org>:
> 27 jan. 2022 kl. 10.43 skrev Robert Pluim <rpluim@gmail.com>:
>
>> Those are codepoints which have both a 'name' and an 'old-name'.
>> 'C-u C-x =' will show both by default, I donʼt think itʼs necessary
>> for 'C-x =', which will show 'name' if it exists, else 'old-name'.
>
> Right, and it is probably the right call here -- only control characters
> have an old-name but no name (some have neither).
> There is a single name/old-name collision, U+1F514 vs U+0007, but there's no
> serious risk of confusion.
According to BabelPad the names are different:
U+0007 <control> : ALERT [BEL]
U+1F514 BELL
>
>> Iʼm more interested in the visual separation between the U+ABCD and
>> the name.
U+ABCD MEETEI MAYEK LETTER HUK : ha
;-)
>
> Just a space seems to be the standard convention to the point that
> characters are nowadays often identified in that manner in prose, as in
> U+00A7 SECTION SIGN.
> It also reinforces the connection between the code and the name, being
> separate from the rest of the information being displayed, which is about
the
> cursor position. Is it good enough, you think?
- bug#24902: [External] : bug#24902: Antw: [EXT] Re: bug#24902: 25.1; C-x = for Unicode, (continued)
- bug#24902: 25.1; C-x = for Unicode, Mattias Engdegård, 2022/01/26
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- bug#24902: Antw: [EXT] Re: bug#24902: 25.1; C‑x = for Unicode, Ulrich Windl, 2022/01/27
- bug#24902: Antw: [EXT] Re: bug#24902: 25.1; C‑x = for Unicode, Robert Pluim, 2022/01/27
- bug#24902: Antw: [EXT] Re: bug#24902: 25.1; C‑x= for Unicode, Ulrich Windl, 2022/01/27
- bug#24902: Antw: [EXT] Re: bug#24902: 25.1; C‑x= for Unicode, Robert Pluim, 2022/01/27
- bug#24902: Antw: [EXT] Re: bug#24902: 25.1; C‑x = for Unicode, Mattias Engdegård, 2022/01/27
- bug#24902: Antw: [EXT] Re: bug#24902: 25.1; C‑x = for Unicode,
Ulrich Windl <=
- bug#24902: Antw: [EXT] Re: bug#24902: 25.1; C‑x = for Unicode, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/01/27
- bug#24902: 25.1; C-x = for Unicode, Robert Pluim, 2022/01/24