[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#24902: Antw: [EXT] Re: bug#24902: 25.1; C-x = for Unicode
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#24902: Antw: [EXT] Re: bug#24902: 25.1; C-x = for Unicode |
Date: |
Sun, 30 Jan 2022 18:46:55 +0200 |
> From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>
> Cc: rms@gnu.org, mattiase@acm.org, rpluim@gmail.com,
> Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de, juri@linkov.net,
> 24902@debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2022 16:47:49 +0100
>
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>
> > For example, when there's some problem with cursor position, and I
> > want to know where point _really_ is. Also, when there are many
> > similar characters in the buffer, and seeing both the character itself
> > and its position goes a long way towards disambiguating stuff.
> >
> > The "part of display ..." and the EOB indication are also occasionally
> > very useful.
>
> Thanks; I see. This sounds very useful especially when debugging the
> Emacs display, but perhaps isn't what most users would feel is vital?
> (But I don't know one way or the other.)
Those are my frequent use cases.
> If we split this up into two commands, but added a user option to get
> the combined display back on `C-x =', would that be acceptable for you?
> (I'm not saying that I actually want that, but just exploring what our
> options are here; I don't have any strong feelings on the matter.)
Why not put the 2 new commands on 2 other keys, and leave "C-x ="
alone?
- bug#24902: Antw: [EXT] Re: bug#24902: 25.1; C-x = for Unicode, (continued)
- bug#24902: Antw: [EXT] Re: bug#24902: 25.1; C-x = for Unicode, Mattias Engdegård, 2022/01/26
- bug#24902: Antw: [EXT] Re: bug#24902: 25.1; C-x = for Unicode, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/01/26
- bug#24902: Antw: [EXT] Re: bug#24902: 25.1; C-x = for Unicode, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2022/01/27
- bug#24902: Antw: [EXT] Re: bug#24902: 25.1; C-x = for Unicode, Juri Linkov, 2022/01/27
- bug#24902: Antw: [EXT] Re: bug#24902: 25.1; C-x = for Unicode, Richard Stallman, 2022/01/28
- bug#24902: Antw: [EXT] Re: bug#24902: 25.1; C-x = for Unicode, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/01/28
- bug#24902: [External] : bug#24902: Antw: [EXT] Re: bug#24902: 25.1; C-x = for Unicode, Drew Adams, 2022/01/28
- bug#24902: Antw: [EXT] Re: bug#24902: 25.1; C-x = for Unicode, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2022/01/29
- bug#24902: Antw: [EXT] Re: bug#24902: 25.1; C-x = for Unicode, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/01/29
- bug#24902: Antw: [EXT] Re: bug#24902: 25.1; C-x = for Unicode, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2022/01/30
- bug#24902: Antw: [EXT] Re: bug#24902: 25.1; C-x = for Unicode,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- bug#24902: Antw: [EXT] Re: bug#24902: 25.1; C-x = for Unicode, Robert Pluim, 2022/01/31
- bug#24902: Antw: [EXT] Re: bug#24902: 25.1; C-x = for Unicode, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2022/01/31
- bug#24902: Antw: [EXT] Re: bug#24902: 25.1; C-x = for Unicode, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/01/31
- bug#24902: Antw: [EXT] Re: bug#24902: 25.1; C-x = for Unicode, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2022/01/31
- bug#24902: Antw: [EXT] Re: bug#24902: 25.1; C-x = for Unicode, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/01/31
- bug#24902: Antw: [EXT] Re: bug#24902: 25.1; C-x = for Unicode, Mattias Engdegård, 2022/01/31
- bug#24902: Antw: [EXT] Re: bug#24902: 25.1; C-x = for Unicode, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2022/01/31
- bug#24902: Antw: [EXT] Re: bug#24902: 25.1; C-x = for Unicode, Mattias Engdegård, 2022/01/31
- bug#24902: Antw: [EXT] Re: bug#24902: 25.1; C-x = for Unicode, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2022/01/31
- bug#24902: Antw: [EXT] Re: bug#24902: 25.1; C-x = for Unicode, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2022/01/28