[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#53729: 29.0.50; Tamil text not shaped in modeline
From: |
Visuwesh |
Subject: |
bug#53729: 29.0.50; Tamil text not shaped in modeline |
Date: |
Thu, 03 Feb 2022 13:37:09 +0530 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
[வியாழன், பிப்ரவரி 03 2022] Eli Zaretskii wrote:
Hello, Eli
>> From: Visuwesh <visuweshm@gmail.com>
>> Cc: 53729@debbugs.gnu.org
>> Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2022 07:15:01 +0530
>>
>> > on the mode line, the buffer is shown in bold, so perhaps there's a
>> > problem with the bold variant of the Noto Serif Tamil font? If you
>> > type the same text in a buffer, but give it the 'bold' face, do you
>> > see the same problem with buffer text as on the mode line?
>>
>> No, when I give it the bold face and insert it in a buffer, the text is
>> shaped properly. Then, I tried setting mode-line-format to
>> "அக்கிச்சிறகுகள்" and '(:propertize "அக்கிச்சிறகுகள்" face bold) and in both
>> cases, the text is shaped properly. I'm not sure where the problem is
>> anymore. I attached screenshots of the same as well.
>
> Strange. I guess the only way of investigating this is to step with
> GDB into the code which renders the mode line, and see which font
> specifically is being used there?
>
I suppose so but I'm confident that "Noto Serif Tamil" is the font used
in the modeline. The only other Tamil font I have installed is "Noto
Sans Tamil" and I can easily make out the difference between the two.
Font selection does not seem to be the problem, at least.
In either case, I think I can only get to this in two weeks. And is the
information in etc/DEBUG all I need (except the breakpoint which will be
provided?)?
> Btw, do I understand correctly that the problem you see is the
> incorrect location of the dot-like diacriticals above the letters? Or
> is the problem something else? (I don't read the Tamil script.)
You're right. In the OP, even simple combinations like க + ் is not
rendered right: the dot should be on top of க but in the buffer name, it
is next to it. However, Emacs seems to have no problem shaping க + ி.
The grossest of all is க + ு where the combined letter should be க plus
some kind of arc that surrounds the letter i.e., கு (hopefully Emacs
renders this fine on your end, if not, I guess I could write it down on
paper and send a picture).
I really hope the above explains the problems with shaping.
- bug#53729: 29.0.50; Tamil text not shaped in modeline, Visuwesh, 2022/02/02
- bug#53729: 29.0.50; Tamil text not shaped in modeline, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/02/02
- bug#53729: 29.0.50; Tamil text not shaped in modeline, Visuwesh, 2022/02/02
- bug#53729: 29.0.50; Tamil text not shaped in modeline, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/02/03
- bug#53729: 29.0.50; Tamil text not shaped in modeline,
Visuwesh <=
- bug#53729: 29.0.50; Tamil text not shaped in modeline, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/02/03
- bug#53729: 29.0.50; Tamil text not shaped in modeline, Visuwesh, 2022/02/03
- bug#53729: 29.0.50; Tamil text not shaped in modeline, Visuwesh, 2022/02/10
- bug#53729: 29.0.50; Tamil text not shaped in modeline, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/02/13
- bug#53729: 29.0.50; Tamil text not shaped in modeline, Visuwesh, 2022/02/13
- bug#53729: 29.0.50; Tamil text not shaped in modeline, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/02/13
- bug#53729: 29.0.50; Tamil text not shaped in modeline, Visuwesh, 2022/02/13
- bug#53729: 29.0.50; Tamil text not shaped in modeline, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/02/14
- bug#53729: 29.0.50; Tamil text not shaped in modeline, Visuwesh, 2022/02/14
- bug#53729: 29.0.50; Tamil text not shaped in modeline, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/02/15