[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#20140: 24.4; M17n shaper output rejected
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#20140: 24.4; M17n shaper output rejected |
Date: |
Tue, 15 Feb 2022 16:40:09 +0200 |
> Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2022 23:26:23 +0000
> From: Richard Wordingham <richard.wordingham@ntlworld.com>
> Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 20140@debbugs.gnu.org
>
> > No, that's not true. I'm not aware of any such limitation; AFAIK
> > Arabic shaping works correctly in Emacs, certainly with HarfBuzz and
> > Emacs 27 or later.
> >
> > Or maybe I misunderstand what you mean by "typewriter-like" fonts?
> > Can you give an example of a non-typewriter-like font for Arabic that
> > I can find on MS-Windows and try?
>
> Not off the top of my head, but compare لحج with the presentation form
> ﳊ U+FCCA ARABIC LIGATURE LAM WITH HAH INITIAL FORM for the first two
> letters. The lam part is a vertical line in the middle of the glyph;
> the 'hah' part forms the lower part of the glyph.
They look identical here (using the default Courier New font). With
what font did you think they will look wrong?
- bug#20140: 24.4; M17n shaper output rejected, (continued)
- bug#20140: 24.4; M17n shaper output rejected, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/02/16
- bug#20140: 24.4; M17n shaper output rejected, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/02/16
- bug#20140: 24.4; M17n shaper output rejected, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/02/13
- bug#20140: 24.4; M17n shaper output rejected, Richard Wordingham, 2022/02/13
- bug#20140: 24.4; M17n shaper output rejected, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/02/14
- bug#20140: 24.4; M17n shaper output rejected, Richard Wordingham, 2022/02/14
- bug#20140: 24.4; M17n shaper output rejected,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- bug#20140: 24.4; M17n shaper output rejected, Richard Wordingham, 2022/02/15
- bug#20140: 24.4; M17n shaper output rejected, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/02/16
- bug#20140: 24.4; M17n shaper output rejected, Richard Wordingham, 2022/02/16
- bug#20140: 24.4; M17n shaper output rejected, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/02/16