bug-gnu-emacs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#54154: 29.0.50; [PATCH] `sieve-manage-getscript' fails if script con


From: Lars Ingebrigtsen
Subject: bug#54154: 29.0.50; [PATCH] `sieve-manage-getscript' fails if script contains multibyte characters
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2022 13:19:51 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux)

"Kai Tetzlaff" <kai.tetzlaff@t-online.de> writes:

>    (with-current-buffer (or buffer (current-buffer))
>      (sieve-manage-send (format "GETSCRIPT \"%s\"" name))
> +    (set-buffer-multibyte nil)
>      (let ((script (sieve-manage-parse-string)))
> +      (set-buffer-multibyte t)

Changing multibyteness in a buffer like this is (virtually) never the
right thing to do -- it usually leads to obscure breakages.

> In general, it is also not clear to me why the response (or process)
> buffer needs to be multibyte enabled at all as it should only be used
> for the line/byte oriented protocol data. But the commit message of
> 8e16fb987df9b which introduced the multibyte handling states:
>
>     commit 8e16fb987df9b80b8328e9dbf80351a5f9d85bbb
>     Author: Albert Krewinkel <krewinkel@moltkeplatz.de>
>     Date:   2013-06-11 07:32:25 +0000
>     ...
>         * Enable Multibyte for SieveManage buffers: The parser won't properly
>           handle umlauts and line endings unless multibyte is turned on in the
>           process buffer.
>     ...
>
> so this was obviously done on purpose. I contacted Albert about this but
> he couldn't remember the details (it's been nearly 10 years).

I don't see why this buffer should be multibyte, either.  The
communication with the server is done using bytes, not characters.  When
we need to have characters, we should decode the data and put it in a
multibyte buffer.

So can you try to back out that commit and see whether it fixes the
problem instead?

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]