bug#54079: 29.0.50; Method dispatching eratically fails

[Eli Zaretskii]

> Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2022 16:37:16 +0000
> From: Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de>
> Cc: acm@muc.de, 54079@debbugs.gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca
> 
>    CHECK_SYMBOL (symbol);
> +  /* If we're in a byte compilation, ensure the definition's symbols
> +     are stripped of their positions. */
> +  if (symbols_with_pos_enabled
> +      && SYMBOL_WITH_POS_P (symbol)
> +      && Ffboundp (Qbyte_run_strip_symbol_positions))
> +    call1 (Qbyte_run_strip_symbol_positions, definition);

The first two conditions should be in reverse order, for speedier
code, shouldn't they?