[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#54296: Add buffer-matching functionality
From: |
martin rudalics |
Subject: |
bug#54296: Add buffer-matching functionality |
Date: |
Wed, 9 Mar 2022 21:34:19 +0100 |
>> Either way I would consider these functions useful and would have wanted
>> to use them in my own code many times before. While difficult, it might
>> also be useful for things like display-buffer-alist (the issue is that
>> a function as a condition in display-buffer-alist has to accept two
>> arguments, while the proposed patch only takes one).
>
> Hm... how would this be used with display-buffer-alist, then? (And
> perhaps Martin has some comments; added to the CCs.)
Either add an optional second argument to 'buffer-match' or add to
'display-buffer-alist' an entry that uses a function as condition that
calls 'buffer-match' with the first argument and returns non-nil if
'buffer-match' reports a match. I see no issue here.
martin
- bug#54296: Add buffer-matching functionality, Philip Kaludercic, 2022/03/07
- bug#54296: Add buffer-matching functionality, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2022/03/09
- bug#54296: Add buffer-matching functionality,
martin rudalics <=
- bug#54296: Add buffer-matching functionality, Philip Kaludercic, 2022/03/10
- bug#54296: Add buffer-matching functionality, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/03/10
- bug#54296: Add buffer-matching functionality, Philip Kaludercic, 2022/03/10
- bug#54296: [External] : bug#54296: Add buffer-matching functionality, Drew Adams, 2022/03/10
- bug#54296: Add buffer-matching functionality, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/03/10
- bug#54296: Add buffer-matching functionality, Philip Kaludercic, 2022/03/11
- bug#54296: Add buffer-matching functionality, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/03/11
- bug#54296: Add buffer-matching functionality, Philip Kaludercic, 2022/03/13
- bug#54296: Add buffer-matching functionality, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/03/13
- bug#54296: Add buffer-matching functionality, Philip Kaludercic, 2022/03/14