bug-gnu-emacs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#40760: 27.0.50; An indentation problem with const and chaining in js


From: Marcin Borkowski
Subject: bug#40760: 27.0.50; An indentation problem with const and chaining in js-mode
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2022 07:26:00 +0100
User-agent: mu4e 1.1.0; emacs 29.0.50

On 2022-03-18, at 02:12, Dmitry Gutov <dgutov@yandex.ru> wrote:

> On 14.03.2022 12:13, Marcin Borkowski wrote:
>> On 2022-03-14, at 10:40, Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> wrote:
>> 
>>> Marcin Borkowski <mbork@mbork.pl> writes:
>>>
>>>> When declaring a const variable which is assigned a value of a long,
>>>> chained expression, the default indentation is wrong (compared to a let
>>>> declaration):
>>>>
>>>> let a = /regex/
>>>>      .test('regex hello');
>>>>
>>>> const a = /regex/
>>>>        .test('regex hello');
>>>
>>> I think this is the intended indentation?  That is, they indent to where
>>> the "a" is.
>> Well, in a tab-only indentation style (used by many people, me
>> included)
>> this is _very_ wrong, e.g. because it results in Emacs using both tabs
>> and spaces here.
>
> I'm fairly certain it's not a very popular style, but we should try to
> cater to it as well, of course.

Interesting - I thought using spaces for indentation is a no-no nowadays
(at least in JS, Lisp is another thing, for obvious reasons).  But I may
be mistaken, and I don't think tabs are inherently better - though we do
use them in our company.

>
>>> Marcin Borkowski <mbork@mbork.pl> writes:
>>>
>>>> This is the temporary solution I employed:
>>>>
>>>> (setq js--declaration-keyword-re "\\<\\(let\\|var\\)\\>")
>>>>
>>>> I would suggest turning this variable into a user option.
>>>
>>> This isn't just used for indentation, so altering this const will lead
>>> to other breakages (and so it shouldn't be customiseable, either).
>> Grep apparently disagrees - I found 5 occurrences of
>> `js--declaration-keyword-re' in Emacs sources, and all of them seem to
>> be related to indentation.  So, I don't see any danger here.  (Anyway,
>> I changed it in my init.el; we'll see how that works.)
>
> I think it would be better to add a more semantically-named user option.

Definitely, the name 

>
> This indentation feature was ported from js2-mode at some point, where
> it is guarded by the (on by default) user option
> js2-pretty-multiline-declarations. The option itself was lost in
> transition.
>
> See js2-old-indent.el for more info.

Very interesting.  FWIW, I almost never have many variables in a single
let/const - I prefer to write

let a = 1;
let b = 2;
const c = 3;
const d = 4;

(and this also is a style I learned where I work).

Best,


-- 
Marcin Borkowski
http://mbork.pl





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]