[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#54542: 29.0.50; dired can't visit a local directory if another buffe
From: |
Michael Albinus |
Subject: |
bug#54542: 29.0.50; dired can't visit a local directory if another buffer visits an unreachable remote (TRAMP) directory |
Date: |
Fri, 25 Mar 2022 17:23:45 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Dima Kogan <dima@secretsauce.net> writes:
Hi Dima,
> 1. emacs -Q
>
> 2. C-x C-f /ssh:host:directory
>
> Visit some remote directory via TRAMP. This opens a dired buffer
>
> 3. Unplug the network cable. Or walk away from wifi. Or turn off the
> remote host. Optionally, do other stuff with emacs. The bug is hit if
> the buffer in step 2 is open somewhere; doesn't have to be visible
>
> 4. C-x C-f /some/local/directory
>
> One would expect step 4 to work just fine because it's a local
> directory, so no TRAMP business should affect it, but it does. Step 4
> will try to connect to the host in step 2. But that host is gone, so
> it'll fail, and step 4 will fail too.
>
> The problem is here:
>
> (defun dired-find-buffer-nocreate (dirname &optional mode)
> ....
> (let (found (blist dired-buffers))
> ...
> (while blist
> ...
> (with-current-buffer (cdr (car blist))
> ....
> (expand-file-name
> (if (consp dired-directory)
> (car dired-directory)
> dired-directory))))
>
> Here dired is trying to figure out if we're already visiting the
> requested directory. In doing so, it loops through all extant dired
> buffers, and runs (expand-file-name) on each one. Running
> (expand-file-name) on a remote directory will try to contact the host.
>
> I'm not attaching a patch because I'm not 100% sure what's appropriate.
> I guess we want to replace
>
> (expand-file-name dired-directory)
>
> with something like this pseudo-code
>
> (concat (tramp-host dired-directory)
> (expand-file-name (tramp-filename dired-directory)))
>
> Except, thinking about edge cases: making sure this works with/without
> TRAMP, making sure relative directories work right, etc, etc.
>
> Do we already have a function that does this?
We have already variable non-essential, which shall help for
non-existing / broken connections. While I could reproduce your initial
recipe locally, the attached patch cures it for me. Could you, please,
test?
> Thanks!
Best regards, Michael.
txtNFwAFVpH6R.txt
Description: Text Data