|
From: | Phil Sainty |
Subject: | bug#54698: non-recursive GC marking [PATCH] |
Date: | Sat, 09 Apr 2022 12:28:54 +1200 |
User-agent: | Orcon Webmail |
On 2022-04-09 01:07, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote:
Po Lu <luangruo@yahoo.com> writes:IMO, it is reasonable to recommend the option that works best for us, which is to turn overcommit off.I don't think so, and neither does Stefan M., but I won't press the issue.
How about we don't "recommend" anything, but instead simply describe the issue and the options available? If users see a *recommendation*, they might follow it without understanding the ramifications. If we're not pressuring users in any direction, then they are less likely to make a change without researching it for themselves. (Indeed we might even "recommend" that they research it for themselves, and provide some pointers to where they can learn more about feature and its pros and cons.) I don't see any harm in pointing out the existence of this feature, but advocating for a non-default configuration seems like a rather dubious idea to me. -Phil
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |