bug#55204: [PATCH v2] 29.0.50; Improve quoting consistency in Eshell predicates/modifiers

[Jim Porter]

On 5/1/2022 1:40 AM, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote:
> Jim Porter <jporterbugs@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > I'm not sure if this change warrants a NEWS entry. On the one hand,
> > it's just a bug fix, but on the other hand, it's an incompatible
> > change. On the third(?) hand, it was never documented, and I'm not
> > sure if anyone would have guessed that you can use, say, alphabetic
> > characters as string delimiters in predicates.
>
> I think it warrants a NEWS entry -- some people may have used
> undocumented values.

Ok, updated (only the first patch has any changes). Hopefully the 
wording is ok.

I've also moved a stray Eshell entry from the "Lisp Changes" section 
into the Eshell subsection of "Changes in Specialized Modes". It was 
more of a user-facing change, so it's probably best to put it there 
alongside all the other similar changes (I added a pointer to the manual 
section too).

0001-Use-a-common-set-of-string-delimiters-for-all-Eshell.patch
Description: Text document

0002-Handle-escaped-characters-in-Eshell-argument-predica.patch
Description: Text document

0003-Handle-escaped-characters-in-Eshell-special-referenc.patch
Description: Text document