bug#19267: 25.0.50; Enhance cycle-spacing with a state where only whitespace after point is deleted

[Lars Ingebrigtsen]

Robert Pluim <rpluim@gmail.com> writes:

> Which is why we should change the default binding of M-SPC to
> cycle-spacing. I know some people will complain, but all they have to
> do is not type M-SPC twice. In short: Iʼm with Tassilo, letʼs be
> disruptive.

Thinking about it a bit more, I agree with you two.  It'd be minimally
disruptive, anyway -- nobody is likely to have a work flow that depends
on hitting `M-SPC' many times in a row, because a second invocation of
`just-one-space' does nothing.

So I think we should rebind `M-SPC' to `cycle-spacing', and allow
customizations of the cycles.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no