bug#36331: 26.2; command run using dired-do-async-shell-command cannot take any input

[Lars Ingebrigtsen]

Prof Jayanth R Varma <jrvarma@gmail.com> writes:

> As a result, the original single command now becomes a background
> command (by the addition of "& wait") and it loses access to standard
> input (it is implicitly run with an empty standard input). If the
> command asks for a confirmation prompt or a password, there is no way
> to provide that input. A simple though somewhat silly way to
> demonstrate the problem is by comparing the following two commands run
> using dired-do-async-shell-command on a single selected file (say
> 1.txt)
>
> First command with "*" in the command line works as expected
>
>        cat - * >2.txt
>
> With this command, the *Async Shell Command* buffer waits for us to
> type in whatever lines that we want. When we terminate the input with
> Control-D (EOF), the command concatenates the inputs lines with 1.txt
> and writes the result to 2.txt.

(I'm going through old bug reports that unfortunately weren't resolved
at the time.)

I can reproduce this, but I think that this works is more by accident
than by design.  I don't think the `&' command is supposed to allow any
input to the command -- at least it's not documented to.

In this example, you can type in stuff in the *Async Shell Command*
buffer, and it'll append to 2.txt what you're typing, which is pretty
eccentric behaviour for this command.

Does anybody know whether this was intended?

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no